Jump to main content.

Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing [Summary]

Quick Links

Media

Subject

Author

New Records

Research Organization

New Downloads

Title

Series Title

Purpose

Subject Downloadable

Title (Downloadable)

Geographic Area

powered by Google

Hide details for KeywordsKeywords
Subject:
2. Cost-Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis
4. Economic Incentives and Other Innovative Approaches
2. Cost-Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis - Major Programs and Media
2. Cost-Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis - Incentives and Related Approaches
4. Economic Incentives and Other Innovative Approaches - Pollution Fees/Charges/Taxes
Environmental Media:
a. Air
b. Water
c. Land
a. Air - Mobile Source
a. Air - Stationary Source
a. Air - Tropospheric
b. Water - Surface
Authors:
Viscusi, W. Kip
Magat, Wesley A.
Carlin, Alan
Dreyfus, Mark
EPA Project Officer/ Manager:
Carlin, Alan
Geographic Area:
Study Purpose:
Methodology Development & Evaluation, Policy Evaluation
Report Series:
Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing
Inventory Record #: EE-0070A
List of all reports in the Series:
You are here--> 1) Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing [Summary]
2) Environmentally Responsible Energy Pricing

Show details for Participating OrganizationsParticipating Organizations
Show details for Report DetailsReport Details
Show details for Published OutputPublished Output
Hide details for SummarySummary
This document summarizes a larger research report (EE-0070B) that explores the full social costs of different energy uses and their implications for pricing the environmental externalities associated with conventional environmental pollution, such as that from lead, particulates, SOX, and ozone to inform the greenhouse warming policy debate. The social costs developed are those implied by a "no regrets" approach to greenhouse warming. The social costs implied often greatly exceed current tax amounts. The midpoint estimates suggest that the price of coal is most out of line with its full social costs. According to the analysis, natural gas is currently overtaxed, and gasoline is appropriately taxed. There is also a substantial range of uncertainty embodied in the no regrets approach.

A later version, dated December 15, 1993, is also available; a copy can be obtained from the NCEE Librarian.


Hide details for How to Obtain ReportHow to Obtain Report

Download report now
Use link to download or view the report


Date Linked: 05/28/2009

Local Navigation


Jump to main content.