Jump to main content.

Upcoming Events

Quick Links

Events

Past Seminars

Past Workshops

Seminars with Video


Please Note: If you are not a federal government employee and would like to attend a seminar, please contact Carl Pasurka (pasurka.carl@epa.gov) in advance so that you can gain access to the building unless someone else is listed in the seminar write-up.

Climate Economics Seminar: Realistic REDD: Improving the forest impacts of domestic policies in different settings
December 9, 2014, 2 - 3:30 PM
Room 4128, William Jefferson Clinton West Building, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC
Alexander Pfaff (Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University)
EPA Contact: Carl Pasurka, 202-566-2275
Abstract: Both theory and evidence regarding forest-relevant decisions by various agents suggest that there are significant constraints on the effectiveness of domestic policies for REDD (i.e., in facilitating a reduction in emissions from deforestation and forest degradation). Economic theory and empirical research identify many factors that affect the incentives for forest clearing, thereby limiting the impact of policies intended to alter any one factor. The presentation will summarize three theoretical frameworks that could be employed to gain insights into how to improve REDD policy design. Economists commonly use these frameworks to model decisions in many settings that are relevant for forests and REDD: (1) producer profit maximization given market integration, focusing on the spatial distributions of competing land uses; (2) rural household optimization given incomplete markets and household heterogeneity, to explain uses of land and forest; and (3) public optimization given production and corruption responses by private firms, which we illustrate with harvesting concessions and which is affected by decentralization. The presentation will also include a review of empirical evidence concerning the impacts of forest conservation, forest-relevant development, and decentralization within the settings described by these models. Both the theory and the evidence suggest that REDD outcomes can be improved by designing policy to match its setting-the relevant local agents and institutions.



Local Navigation


Jump to main content.